

You are being really condescending for no reason. If you don’t want to talk with me, just don’t.
Now, you said this:
All of it. Until you fully comprehend that when everyone’s equipped with anti-oppression tools, nobody can, or should be oppressed.
After which I said I found it a bit much to read all that. After that you start rambling about me also not reading all the laws and actions of the state. Yes, that’s my point, I think, in both cases, it’s a bit much to ask me to read every single document ever generated about a certain topic.
And for full disclosure, I am not a native english speaker, so yes, sometimes I do make mistakes.
Where did I mention European colonialism? I just said I thought that anarchy is also a very flawed system. I don’t see how that could be considered condescending.
I indeed do think that information should be freely available. I just don’t see how the existence of a state is incompatible with information being freely available or how anarchy would lead to information being freely available.
Also, I don’t believe I am willfully ignorant. I just haven’t been exposed to anarchy that much, so I am genuinely interested to learn about it.