• 反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So when you projected the problems with European colonialism in shifting goals of true freedoms for all, that was wasn’t condescension on your part, just cognitive dissonance on your part.

    Yes, that’s my point, I think, in both cases, it’s a bit much to ask me to read every single document ever generated about a certain topic.

    Then we agree, that imprisonment in ignorance of the law shouldn’t be oppressed, and should be abolished until everyone can learn the rules everyone abides by, no? Because the point of anarchism is that everyone should have access to literature, and be able to comprehend the rules one abides by, without being exploited. You can’t really do that in European countries that still disallow library access and literacy exclusivities.

    Same here! I learned English to read American and European comics & cartoons, but I try not to be ignorant on who oppresses my rights to read queer books, transexual medicine, and indigenous rights! This is why I do not bloodwash European Imperials still stealing resources from others that should benefit them first, then others. Slavery should have never existed, but Europe still enslaves!

    • ThekingoflordaMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Where did I mention European colonialism? I just said I thought that anarchy is also a very flawed system. I don’t see how that could be considered condescending.

      I indeed do think that information should be freely available. I just don’t see how the existence of a state is incompatible with information being freely available or how anarchy would lead to information being freely available.

      Also, I don’t believe I am willfully ignorant. I just haven’t been exposed to anarchy that much, so I am genuinely interested to learn about it.