GLAD YOU COMPREHEND WHY I’M AGAINST THIS NEOLIBERALIST TAKE ON “FREEDOM.” May your WHITE LANDHOLDING Europeans grant you the “freedom” you so crave!

I’m honestly not sure if I’m being trolled right now. In the previous post you were (mistakenly) praising the declaration of independence for providing equal freedom to everybody and now you’re against it?

I hope this reading comprehension check works, if not, I hope you get to 12th grade comprehension this year!

Just to let you know, this is the first time you actually explicitly said why the US revolution was proof of anarchism working. Maybe focus less on other people having a reading comprehension level high enough to pull the words out of your mind and actually state your point rather than hiding behind vague statements.

When you know the declaration of independence was made to free everyone, EVEN if colonialists lied to keep slavery.

I’m not going to even engage with your other points because this shows that you’re very misinformed regarding the most basic facts of the US revolution. The declaration of independence was never supposed to apply to anyone other than (white) landholding men. Any indian tribes allied with either side were allies of opportunity. The colonists explicitly wanted to expand westward into the indians which the british were against. The british were not oppressing the indians, the colonists were.

I’m not going to engage with your further since you don’t seem to understand even your own positions.

So just to nail down the goal posts before you move them again, you believe that native american tribes were anarchistic and because they were involved in the US revolution in some capacity, that makes the US revolution proof that anarchism works?

When people united against a common oppressor.

No offense but I’m not even sure if you know what your politics are. The US rebelled partially because Britain didn’t want the colonists to expand West. It had nothing to do with anarchism.

So at what point was the US revolution proof of anarchism working? When the rich landholders rebelled against the king? Or when the rich landholders retainer power after the revolution?

Being asked for evidence that anarchism works and then just linking the US Revolution is an absolutely hilarious display of “Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about?”.

I just don’t like hypocrites who deem Russia the devil and give a pass to The West while they are literally being an accomplice of genocide right now in Gaza.

Surrendering now is better than losing more and more territories later.

Gaza will not be destroyed later, it will be destroyed if it doesn’t make peace now.

If you’re so brave, why aren’t you at the front lines defending them?

EDIT: Because I know people are going to miss the point, this is a copy paste of his own message.

Please consult this reference manual: https://smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=235

Do I have to have good solutions for climate change and homelessness and drug addiction and wealth inequality and world hunger in order to comment on those, too?

No, but you should either have a more realistic stance than “if one single bad thing happens as a result of it then I don’t think we should do it.” or stop providing your opinion on the topic.

Nah, I have a problem with both sides.

The most important thing is that you can attack everybody and feel superior to them all.

Why are we fighting over which turd is bigger when we need to clean it all up?

I’m not fighting for either side, I’m just disagreeing with the assertion that the concert goers who were murdered by Hamas were “sacrificed by Israel”.

That’s great. What do you think the Israelis should do?

Your performative outrage is pretty funny.

In another comment from you I’m a Hamas supporter.

Lol are you fucking stupid? Necessary to murder civilians? You hamas supporting psychopath.

Funnily enough, all of this is in response to someone saying that the Israeli government sacrificed someone’s family after they were murdered, which you apparently don’t have any problem with.

So how do you deal with opponents deliberately putting their military infrastructure next to civilian targets?

I feel like you either don’t understand what I wrote or deliberately misunderstood it.

Feel free to ask if you need help understanding what I wrote.

Those are the only two options I guess, indiscriminately murder civilians and blow up hospitals or suicide.

Feel free to share your operational plan for how the Israelis should proceed, I’m sure it will be very realistic and grounded in military reality.

I’m saying people who commit war crimes should go to the place where the world has decided to try war criminals and then they should punish them like we have punished war criminals in the past.

So you’re obviously also saying that Hamas should be hung from the neck until dead.

Attacking a hospital containing active enemy combatants is not a war crime. Garrisoning troops in a hospital is a war crime. Not making necessary precautions to move civilians away from the combat area is also a war crime.

Deliberately harming civilians is a war crime. Harming civilians by accident or as a byproduct of necessary military action is not a war crime.

Still, i can’t argue that most people consider this kind of revenge to be also a component of self defense.

Why did the bell ring immediately after Hamas started losing? You don’t get to perform an offensive, have less success than expected and then simply call off the war.

However, speaking of genocide, Hamas (hell, all of Palestine) is not in a position to seriously threaten the Israeli people as a whole nor the Israeli Jews specifically.

The Arab states have been trying to do this literally since the creation of Israel. The only reason it hasn’t occurred yet is because they lost all the wars they started.

So when Hamas guns down Israeli civilians that are not next to military targets it’s justified and actually the fault of the jews, and when Israel strikes Hamas military targets that are deliberately placed next to their own civilians it’s never justified and the jews hould hang?

Very cool.

There really is no way to bomb hospitals and then blame the hospital for being a human shield when it was your bomb that murdered those children.

What do you realistically expect armies to do when their opponents place all their military assets next to civilian targets? Just give up and kill themselves?

Didn’t read further. This is pointless. I’m going to assume you don’t want the US to stop.

I want the US to stop invading other countries just like I want Russia and China to stop invading other countries.

Funny how US imperialism is always bad while Soviet/Chinese imperialism is just “missing context”, provoked, justified, or just papered over with lies like “they were really gentle in their occupation”.

Can you name even one instance of Soviet or Chinese imperialism that was, in your opinion, as bad as something the US has done? Not forced upon them by history or made bad by propaganda, just straight up them being bad imperialists.

Yes?

That’s good. I didn’t think you would be able to denounce the imperialism of the Soviet Union.

Do you or do you not think the US should stop interfering?

I don’t want the Taiwanese to be subjugated by the Chinese, and I know that they don’t want to either, so I support any actions that allow Taiwan to remain independent.

I don’t want a Chinese invasion, but I also wouldn’t want a US invasion of Cuba or the assassination of Fidel Castro.

Who said I want an invasion to happen?

OK, you “won’t be happy about it” but will “understand why it happened”. Do you feel the same way about a US invasion of Cuba, and the assassination attempts on Castro? You just wanted the Soviet Union to fuck off and mind its own business?