Cool, but now SSH into a remote server and then try to open nano. It doesn’t.

After using it for 3 weeks I concluded that as Kitty breaks the fundamentals all the nice shiny isn’t worth it.

if you turn off “Show posts from child feeds” on the Forumverse feed then https://piefed.social/f/lemmycategories will load much faster…

Here it is! https://peertube.wtf/w/vq9GtVwjVUG2xzC5owADR8

That’s pretty cool. Lots of potential for richer warnings than a beep on the right or left too, like a voice saying “a bike is Infront of you, move right 2 feet”.

Yes, for sure. I think the old community would Announce a Move activity to all followers, which would cause all the other instances to update their Follows to point to the new community.

Can you recommend an instance?

It doesn’t do subscriptions. That would need to be initiated on the old community and currently all the old communities are on Lemmy instances, so that’s a non-starter.

The process outlined above is “co-operative” in the sense that the moderators of the old community have decided to make the move and initiate the process themselves using their piefed.social accounts.

But also anyone could choose to ‘fork’ the old community, with or without the old community mods involvement. The old community would not be locked and would continue as-is while the local copy of it would then be a separate community with all the old content in it. They would then diverge from that point onwards.

I imagine there might sometimes be a need to reverse this process too, to re-associate a local community with it’s remote counterpart. Or to merge two communities…

Elon Musk, the de facto head of DOGE, lowered expectations of the group’s savings from $1 trillion to $150 billion by the end of the fiscal year.

So, a failure even on their own terms.

This idea is quite similar to what Bluesky is doing, with “Labels” https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/moderation.

We’d need some way to crowdsource the verification and validity of the labels so people can’t just put low-quality or abusive labels everywhere.

It could potentially reduce the amount of work moderators need to do because spam would be labelled as such by anyone and if a few others also label it the same then it would reach a threshold where the label becomes active.

Does anyone have experience with this way of moderating content on Bluesky? How well does it work in practice?

That was more interesting than 18 downvotes. Thanks!

Boeing’s stock is doing ok - https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BA/

Surely the best way to end all wars is to win them all. /s

It is against the Geneva Convention to use POWs for propaganda.

Some of your posts in [email protected] were deleted by a moderator 10 days ago. https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=17651002

I’ll check if there’s more Piefed could be doing to notify people when their content is deleted.

Yes and $29.95 for unlimited years. No subscription.

Imagine you want to write a competitor to PostgreSQL and you start out by importing SQLite into your project and building on top of that. To you it seems like a good idea because you’ve never written a DB app before and the only DB you’ve ever seen before is SQLite. You’ll get a prototype real fast but you’ll never build a PostgreSQL equivalent because you never learned the foundational knowledge of how a DB works and because SQLite forecloses all the pathways you need to get there.

Same thing.

Because outsourcing your core business processes is a bad idea. A fediverse app that relies on a library to do all the fediverse stuff is going to have a bad time. Not straight away, but eventually.

Noted

Whoa, interesting bug 🤔