Thanks for making these guides!

Hmm…

Maybe voting for the party of “climate change denial” and “customer protection removal” was a bad idea…

But nah. Let’s vote for the people who are “making America great” by deporting and incarcerating legal immigrants and citizens without due process, tanking the economy with tariff wars, shitting on our trade partners, threatening our neighbors with annexation, defunding science research, taking away people’s Medicaid, putting a conspiracy theorist in charge of healthcare, and letting a billionaire Nazi run roughshod over the vital government agencies while pretending to find fraud and waste—and that’s not even an exhaustive list.

But hey, at least gas and eggs are cheap, housing is plentiful, and we all have “so much money, we don’t know how to spend it.” Oh wait…

Layering isn’t bad, but what happens is with each update, the system tries to re-layer each of those packages. If some are missing from the next deployment’s rpm database or have been superceded by another package, you’ll run into these kinds of issues.

In my case, for example, my next deployment was missing java-17-openjdk, because it had been superceded by other metapackages.

Have you layered any packages?

Technically they don’t own the code itself (because it’s open source), but if that’s your metric then no FOSS project can be meaningfully owned by anyone.

That’s what I mean. You could fork the entire codebase today and start your own thing. Yes, that would be a massive undertaking, but we’re not talking about volunteers trying their hand at being Red Hat, we’re talking about governments with real resources to throw at it.

And I agree that no FOSS project can be meaningfully owned by anyone. That’s kinda the point. The larger community allows “ownership” for various reasons, but many projects can be and do get forked and spun into different things.

For the “none of the providers can be installed” errors, there’s likely been a package name change or removal in 42. I ran into a similar issue with Bazzite. I uninstalled the offending package, then reinstalled after the update.

The last one says there’s a package conflict. You’ll need to remove the one you have in order to proceed.

Gaming? Pretty sure that’s FL Studio, and all those stimulants and depressants would make gaming performance terrible.

Inspiring amazing music, on the other hand…

Tax cuts for the rich in disguise.

Ubuntu isn’t a good choice, since Canonical is essentially the Microsoft of the Linux world. Suse makes sense, though. NixOS would be good, too, since you could scale your deployments.

Land doesn’t vote. Chicago easily outnumbers the population of the rest of the state. Illinois might be red without Chicago, but that doesn’t mean they’re the majority just because they are spread out over the remaining area.

I’m going to go ahead and say YDI, since the scope of that community isn’t really shitposting, but FYI:

• [email protected]
• [email protected]

…both exist. You might have more fun with your trolling there.

I hate that you’re probably right.

Nobody has yet provided a good reason why this matters. Red Hat doesn’t own Fedora, and RHEL is downstream from Fedora. You could fork it in whatever country you live in and start a new project if you wanted to.

What is so important about these downstream ties that it taints the entire project? (I’m really asking, by the way.)

Why do you think so?

Tax cuts for the wealthy. Right here. This is taking public money and pumping it into private education that primarily only the wealthy can afford and is already paying for.

All because a bunch of wealthy assholes are butthurt they have to pay taxes for a school of which they voluntarily choose not to avail themselves.

The party of “fiscal responsibility;” the party of the “working class.” What a fucking joke.

Potato

Fucking hell, how many times is this dumb idea going to rear its ugly head?

https://youtube.com/shorts/Ym3tDIzueBU

Brilliant!

Removed by mod