• ThePyroPython
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah even Ryan Air tried proposing this and got roundly shunned.

      Mostly because they’d lose their core customer base of Gammon export to Majorca.

      And on behalf of the rest of the UK, my sincerest apologies to Spain. Please feel free to dispose of those cunts, nobody will miss them and you’d be doing us both a favour.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “are you tired of battling for personal space? does your seatmate steal your in-flight lunch? does the thought of constant snacking make your skin crawl? fear no more, Nofatass Air is here! at NA, we too have endured the pain and suffering of traditional airfare. with our state-of-the-art ejection system, undesirable passengers can be dealt with at the touch of a button. and our patented seat-scale technology means that this can be automated; great for letting our flight attendants relax. the best part? there is no change in pricing - since we have already taken payment before boarding, we have already profited when we eject someone at 35,000 feet! visit nofatass.air and start enjoying travel again, today!”

    • Death_Equity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      No it wouldn’t, if the industry as a whole started pricing based on weight, travellers aren’t going to start taking trains and ships.

      If a minority of airlines didn’t switch, they would get more passengers that would save money by going with them and would ultimately fail in the market.

      If a minority of airlines switched, they would decrease costs and very few people would decide against saving money on airfair on principle.

      The big airlines switching would have a new means to increase profits and decrease costs, which they love.

      Yes, the media will drag them through the mud and social media would have a tantrum, but the airlines would profit because nobody is going to decide 3 days on a train is better than 6 hours on a plane.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Any airline that tried this would immediately get sued in just about every country that has any sort of discrimination laws, and the airline would lose ten times out of ten.

        • Death_Equity
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Being overweight is not a protected class in the US, EU, or England. Some states and cities have laws that do prohibit weight based discrimination.

          There is no discrimination going on anyways when charging based on weight. You are contributing 300lbs of cargo and that cargo cost more than 200lbs of cargo to transport.

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Being overweight isn’t the only source of weight variation. If a 6’4" man weighs the same as a healthy 5’0" woman, he’s probably dying.

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You can legally discriminate against size though.

              If you’re in the top 1 percentile of sizes, any and all clothes will be much more expensive than if you were in the median.

            • Death_Equity
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That is true, but if her plus her luggage weights the same as him and his luggage, they should pay the same. If they don’t, their ticket price should reflect that.

              • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                You don’t fly much, do you? Getting through check in is a pain in the ass enough as it is, and now you want to add a weigh in and price adjustment step for every person onto that?

                • Death_Equity
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  I don’t. I stopped flying a few years after 9/11 because I despise the TSA, being confined with inconsiderate people, and love road trips. If flying was what it was like in the 90s, I would be more inclined to fly.

                  Stand on a scale with all your bags at check-in. No issue.

                  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    Except there’s plenty of issue. Do you think none of those people, whom you already know are inconsiderate, are going to lie about their weight? Hell, they don’t even have to be knowingly lying, their scale at home could just be wrong. Now you have to deal with price adjustments at the gate, and you know people are going to argue with the attendants about that.

      • Alexstarfire
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m not going to give a lengthy rebuttal. Just consider this, if you’re right, why haven’t they done it yet? Weight matters A LOT for airlines.

        • Death_Equity
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          There is a time to reap and a time to sow.